Well I just listened to Breitling's response to the interview with John Jagerson. He claimed that John was interviewing himself. Not even close. I never even met John online until a couple of weeks ago. John is on record as having never bought dinar. I am on record as having bought before I did adequate due diligence. The fact is John doesn't need to interview himself. He has posted a ton of stuff on his own website, a lot more than was included in this interview. I just thought it might be nice to include an interview from somebody with his background along with the other interviews I've already conducted. Many of my readers don't venture outside of the dinar forums very often so maybe they've never heard his perspective.
Another claim that Breitling made is that I am engaging in personal attacks. Not true. Everything I have posted on B in the past has been relevant to this investment. I have never called him ugly, fat, stupid, or anything like that. I did call him a douchebag but that's kind of the theme of this blog, ya know? It's nothing personal. It just means your conduct as a dinar "authority" needs improvement. When I reveal a potential conflict of interest, or disprove statements made, or point out cases of flawed intel those aren't personal attacks. That's just me being a watchdog for the dinar world.
Something else that I find interesting is that B claims he got a ton of email from people ranting about that interview. So far I have only received email from one person who took issue with what John said. Odd, huh?
One final point. John Jagerson offered to debate Breitling or any other guru on any number of topics. Breitling apparently is declining this offer based on his claim that John (supposedly me) has been attacking people personally. Now that I have set the record straight on this I wonder if B will reconsider?